*Obituary

YT

In most sexual relations, regardless of the indeterminate of fluid genders involved, there is generally active and passive -- what we used to think of as male and female. It has been quite some time since Europe was masculine, and these past several lefty administrations have done much to reassign America's gender.  I mean Uncle Sam, not so much Lady Liberty -- she's just ignored. 

The American Left. Feminine. It's a stereotype I don't like, so much, but words have meaning, so, bitchy … the left, escalating to mob or syndicalist violence.  Masked.  

The Left finds its completion not in apposition to the American Right, but in the hard brown machismo of illegalism, and islam, with it's latest incarnation in Hamas, the baby killers.  Actively, aggressively hostile to the feminine, and humanity.

Do Moslem cultures oppress women? Define oppress.  But, yes. I'm talking about the normal ones, excluding honor killings and clitorectomies, and nine-year-old girls in arranged marriages.  We'll count that as NOT normal.

Yet the woke, a sort of undead, march, protest, rally -- rally round the flag, the un- and anti-american flag -- and call jews Nazis while themselves praising Hitler.  

'Ts been a few years sense it was in the news, islamists executing homosexuals.  There are no gays -- that political philosophy and identity -- in islamist controlled regions. It's the behavior that they execute, and the religion of gayness is forbidden.

Yet alphabet sexuals activists LMNOP … support Hamas.

These groups are not stupid as the term is generally reckoned. Rather, the politics of their identity takes second place to the much deeper need, to balance their extremism with its spiritual counterpart. Liberals bend over ... um, backwards for brown … privilege.

It seems not to be possible to have a war without having war protesters.  ... but no, I'm mostly wrong about that.  I seem to think that the Left loves Ukraine -- I sometimes still say THE Ukraine.  I don't know what to think.  Disliking war is a good thing.  War is an overall negative, a lose-lose situation, what with all that death and destruction.

But consider the mindset that protested our involvement against Hitler. The Left then did what it always does, the difference being that in that case they are seen for what they are -- opponents of liberty -- friends of not mere tyranny, but genocidal evil.  Yes, this is my usual broad-brush caricature. But I’m painting a big picture. Specifically, there is a bizarre but predictable blindness to the great trend of the past generation.

Oriana Fallaci wrote The Force of Reason, on the death throes of Europe -- or rather, the birthing of Eurabia.  She interviewed terrorist George Habash in 1972, and quotes him as saying that Israel was not the true Palestinian problem. Rather, Islam’s great conflict was “against Europe and America,” and its true goal was to allow “no peace for the West.” The islamist cause would “advance step by step. Millimeter by millimeter. Year after year. Decade after decade. Determined, stubborn, patient. This is our strategy. A strategy that we shall expand throughout the whole planet.”

There is a plan.  It's not like Satan on a throne ... anyways, we're the Satan around here.  They're like Cerberus ... no, call it Hydra, so many many heads.  That was Al Quaeda, with so many, many cells. But, there is the plan, the goal, and like ants, they work relentlessly toward it.  It's just that it takes generations. 

Re how this plan will be realized, Fallaci quotes an Algerian President, who announced to the General Assembly of the UN in 1974: “One day millions of men will leave the southern hemisphere of this planet to burst into the northern one. But not as friends. Because they will burst in to conquer, and they will conquer by populating it with their children. Victory will come to us from the wombs of our women.”

Consider, in Brussels, the soul of contemporary Europe, that the most common name for a newborn boy is Mohammed.  Consider what this means for women. What are women good for? Incubation.

All these super hero universe movies, with their race-swapped super empowered female super hero mutant  women -- not so powerful, in the Moslem hemisphere.  There is an Islam that is sane and honorable.  More power to it.  And more power to the Jews as well ... the power not to be murdered, or not to be murderers.  We'll just pretend that applies equally to both sides.  

That's what the comic book woman hero movies are all about. Pretending.  

In his A Heart Turned East (1997), Adam LeBor quotes a London-based mullah, thus: “We cannot conquer these people with tanks and troops, so we have got to overcome them by force of numbers.” 

Sounds like that plan.

Again, in Oslo, Moslem supremacist Mullah Krekar said that Norway would be changed by Moslems, rather than Moslems by Norway. “Just look at the development within Europe, where the number of Muslims is expanding like mosquitoes. By 2050, 30 percent of the population in Europe will be Muslim. ...Our way of thinking,” he declared, “will prove more powerful than yours.”

Is this conspiracy-nut-job stuff?  Connecting unconnected sound bites?  The preceding quotes are taken from the review by Brendan Bernhard, “The Fallaci Code.” In his article, Bernhard summarizes Fallaci’s explanation for the Moslem surge.  In the mid ’70s, there was an actual, technical, negotiated

 “arrangement between European and Arab governments according to which the Europeans, still reeling from the first acts of PLO terrorism and eager for precious Arabian oil, made significantly more precious by the 1973 OPEC crisis, agreed to accept Arab ‘manpower’ (i.e., immigrants) along with the oil. They also agreed to disseminate propaganda about the glories of Islamic civilization, provide Arab states with weaponry, side with them against Israel and generally toe the Arab line on all matters political and cultural. ... Fallaci recounts a 1977 seminar in Venice, attended by delegates from 10 Arab nations and eight European ones, concluding with a unanimous resolution calling for ‘the diffusion of the Arabic language’ and affirming ‘the superiority of Arab culture.’”

That's European leaders, conspiring with Arab leaders, to affirm that Arab culture was superior.  That's a suicide note. 

For publishing her ideas, Fallaci would have gone on trial in June 2006 in France, where “Islamophobia” is not just a thought crime, but a criminal crime. Evidence for the truth of her position was not a permissible defense, in France.  There was no trial, because she died.  

The mere assertion of a danger is not proof of danger. And belief in conspiracies, no matter how publicly attested, is still disreputable.  The logic of the matter is obvious.  But many false things are obviously true.  Every religion there is, is false, except maybe one. Because, if they contradict one another….  You know,  logic.  

So, let us eschew conspiracy. Instead, allow me to rehash the obvious correlations. The infertility of the West matches the fecundity of Islam. So, non replacement birthrates.  Also, the moribund patriotism of the West is matched by the sectarian fanaticism of islamism.  Europe learned to stop having religions wars - and their wars became nationalistic.  

But these past several generations, in the West, their passion  extends only as far as the skin. And its a non-reproducing passion.  Moslems have a passion for their culture. 

I speak in broad generalizations, and so I am certainly wrong in the specific. But you will have noticed in your studies of history, modern and ancient, that civilizations fall. All of them. Every one -- excluding city-states. How? Military invasion is never the actual cause. The real cause is always twofold: decadence from within, and migration from without.  

Both are at work, here.   We're seeing it in fast motion, in the Left's (I don't even want to say biden's name) -- in Left's open borders, love of crime, love of drugs, etc.

Hitler in Mein Kampf told the world what he intended. The world did not believe he meant it. Shall we learn from the error of our ancestors? If we repeat the error, our descendants will inherit a third world culture, and those who do not convert to, well, either islam, or catholicism, will live in the servility and oppression of dhimmitude. Or they will not live at all.

Am I overstating this?  Yes, I am.  But if you are sane, did you foresee what a catastrophe the situation is, now?  I vividly remember the '70s, the Carter Error.  This is at least as bad.   

The most prudent course, is, when people say they are your enemy, believe them.  

J