Grief and anger are never far apart.
It’s easy, and right, to hate your enemies.
Jesus said love your enemies, yet Jesus comes again with a sword. There he is, Jesus, on his final Monday, his wide strides kicking up the dust as he rushes up the Temple Mount road, cold rage burning in his eyes, his fingers busy knotting together the strips of leather he is braiding into a whip. What is he planning? And he descends upon the moneychangers like fire from the sky, scourging them with his special purpose, handmade whip. He whips them not as severely as he himself would soon be scourged, but it's no less violent for that.
A violent and peaceful man. Contradiction? Of course not. Wisdom. What does “hate” mean? — and “love”? What does “enemy” mean? There is a hate that is simply the emotion that goes along with the craving for justice, and the willingness to exact it. Am I the only one who's ever felt that?
As for “enemy,” consider the Indian tribe battling the US cavalry in the west. Here comes the cavalry riding over the hill, first thing seen is the American flag. That flag was not a symbol of freedom and justice to those Indians. It is to me. It wasn’t a symbol of rescue, to the Indians. To the wagon train, to the settlers, yes. To me, our flag represents the highest attainments of mankind. Not to the Indians. And they were right. To them it was death, or oppression, or injustice, or at best ultimate defeat.
A tragedy? In the classical sense, yes – a man, or culture, undone by the flaws in his own character. But its not a tragedy, in that there are forces of nature, and of history, that are inevitable, and their outcome cannot be called tragic without expanding the word beyond meaningful limits. Hurricane Katrina was not a tragedy, but a calamity. If a soldier aims his rifle at a brave, and kills a child instead -- yes, a tragedy, if an accident is the same as a tragedy.
Yet there is somehow the idea of necessity, bound up in tragedy. Surely accidents aren’t necessary. The death of a child is so very many things, and there is no simple answer, and any answer there is, is not clear. How complex.
But this I know: 9/11 was not a tragedy, 10/7, the Hamas outrage, was not a catastrophe. If there were no better words, then perhaps. But there are better words. Atrocity. Deliberate, planned, brutal. What do we do with such monsters these? Monsters, to us -- heroes, to themselves.
But what do we do? Love them? I will love them, as God loves those he sends to hell. I believe God does love them. But he loves justice too. Eventual justice. The traditional symbol of justice is a pair of balances – a glancing acknowledgment of a multiplicity of factors, too many for meaningful calculation. So all those variables are collapsed into just two plates of the scale, because eventually all answers resolve into yes, or no. Otherwise they're not answers.
So we simplify and use symbols. And our love for them, the enemy, must be complex - if we are to survive.
What is necessary cannot be wrong. In this, perhaps we stumble upon a sort of key to the problem. If we are commanded to love, then to love is right. But how to love? What to forgive? There is no emotion, nor any instinct, that is wrong in itself. But when they are perverted, well.
Capitalism may certainly contain the seeds of its own destruction, per Karl Marx – a man who has far more blood on his hands than Christ – other people’s blood, that is. Capitalism, and Western Civilization, might certainly fall prey to some greater force of history, some force that is truer to human nature and emotion and instinct, truer to the laws of nature and of nature’s God – if there should be such a truer force.
But given the inevitability of hurricanes and volcanos and droughts, it's only location and timing that makes the difference between God's wrath, and the merely random. Antartica has many storms, and none of them are judgments from God.
That's how it is, with all calamities. They will occur. As will tragedies. And atrocities, and injustice, and the demand for the redress of injustice. The most descriptive term I can find for this universe is "entropic." entropy. Things just wearing out, in time. Maybe replaced, for a time. Justice is supposed to restore order, for a time.
The Indian mother holding her dead child, weeping tears of grief and rage – her prayers went unanswered. The families of those killed in falling buildings or crashing planes, or flames, or rains for bullets – the dead remain dead. The guilty are outside our power to avenge – or they're in our power, but unlikely to exhibit the remorse and repentance we so much desire. Perhaps we should love our enemies most, when they are outside the reach of our justice. This would have the virtue of obedience to God, while preventing our souls from curdling.
Jesus, tradition has it, was a carpenter -- after his adoptive father. Perhaps Jesus made the cross of his own crucifixion, if it was a recycled cross. What is certain is that he made the whip he used on the backs of the moneychangers. It may be that he had the right to be a whipmaker, or rather a whip user, because of his use, on the cross. I don’t know. It’s too complex. What I do know is that moneychangers, as lawbreakers, need whipping. And we should allow neither anger, nor grief – nor any other instinct or emotion – to pervert the craving, not for revenge or vengeance, but for justice.
J
No comments:
Post a Comment