So Newt is saying it’s WW III. Actually it’s WW IV, as I’ve noted before. What, the Cold War wasn’t war? It didn’t involve the world? It wasn’t a conflict between super alliances for survival? True, it lasted two generations, but I don’t see how that disqualifies it from being a world war. And true, it was hardly ever fought directly between the two major forces, US and
On the other hand -- the correct hand -- it is not a World War at all. Certainly not. Clearly. Because World Wars, whatever powers they might involve, require a war footing. They require conscription. They require a sooper-dooper concentration of economic resources. In World Wars, nuances fade, birds cease their song, and the world goes black and white.
It doesn’t have to do with the threat. I’m not even sure about World War I. What exactly was the threat to us there? For World Wars must of course involve the
So it doesn’t have to do with the threat. It has to do with the response to the threat. A major precipitating event of WW I, for the
Alas,
Al-Queda issues a Zimmerman telegram every few weeks, and what is our response? Not so black and white.
That of course is the key concept. Seriousness. Unseriousness. Not of our soldiers -- they are deadly serious. And not of our enemies. They get it. Us. Us. We're not serious. Our attention has wandered. Gas prices are high. What an outrage! I won't multiply climaxes. The point is obvious. At least to us. You and me, and the enemy. We get it. As for the peaceniks, well, they hold so few allegiances that their conversion to the religion of peace wouldn't even have to be coerced. That's the side they're on, anyway. Because, as they know, war is not the answer. By which they mean self-defense.
This is a World War? I wish.
J
No comments:
Post a Comment