"Welcome to First Grade, people who produce sperm and people who produce eggs." "Teacher! -- that little person who produces sperm pulled my hair!" "Mrs Krabappel, can I go to the people who produce sperm's room." That's not going to work out so good in high schools, the sperm room. And the boys will always be making clucking noises around the girls. "Hey Suzzy, make mine scrambled! Haw haw haw."
"I am Person Who Produces Eggs, hear me roar — I am too big to ignore!" "Little people who produce eggs just want to have fun!" "Hello, little person who produces eggs. Can you help me find my puppy? It ran into these bushes. Let's go look! You can help!"
The Tranzauthority's claimed-objective is to be inclusive for trannies, many of whom still have real and embarrassing penises. Lia's is out there for anyone to see -- anyone who's interested enough to go looking, as I was (about average, I'd say?). But supposedly and assumedly these tranzes are not producing sperm. This, sadly, equates transsexuals with baby boys, who have penises but no sperm. Maybe that's their dream for the future — Boyz II Tranz not as a tranz-band, but a demographic.
Inclusive, somehow -- okay, got it. But little boys do not produce sperm. Men with specific injuries or diseases do not produce sperm. Women do not produce eggs -- their eggs were formed along with the ovaries, as a fetus; it's a limited and extant supply. So no female humans, nor a very significant number of male humans, qualify as people, or at best they're marginalized.
The eufeminists are excluding over half the human population. They are very stupid, but they might manage to say that they mean "produce" as in produce your Party membership card. So, emit. For males, ejaculation: it cannot be surprising that at the root of their self-image is pornography and masturbation. Likewise, for women, menstruation. Sort of a Don Lemon thing [an entirely forgotten cable news reader and "queer advocate", remembered only in wikipedia]. He got fired from CNN pretty much for precisely this: women in their prime, capable of producing (eggs) -- all others, step out of line please and go sit in the corner, back of the bus, kennel.
Something wrong then with that troublesome verb, produce. The correct terms, given the claimed purpose, would be people who have penies and people who have jynas. (I'm just getting tired of being technical.) Instead of "Good evening ladies and gentlemen," it can be "Good evening, PJs". Time will do its thing, shorten it -- "Welcome to First Grade, little peenz and jynez." Yes, it's coming into focus.
Sperm was a very awkward, embarrassing and frankly vulgar word to me when I was of a certain age. Now I'm thinking of using it as a pronoun. You remember -- I thought it would work, fish as my pronoun for they/ them/ their/ theirs, it/ it/ its/ its, that/ those and this/ these. But sperm works just as well. Maybe sperm for plural and fish for singular?
It needs to be beta tested, or alpha, however it works. I was going to do that, find/replace these pronouns in some neutral paragraph. I thought of the Constitution, but that is densely written, and it favors specific language over demonstrative pronouns. I thought of biden's SotU address, but it doesn't have any paragraphs, only sentences separated by lines. So to proceed with this project, you test it out and get back to me.
No, ah, I have it:
Sperm needs to be beta tested, or alpha, however sperm works. I was going to do sperm, find/replace sperm pronouns in some neutral paragraph. I thought of the Constitution, but sperm is densely written, and sperm uses specific language rather than demonstrative pronouns. I thought of biden's SotU address, but sperm doesn't have any paragraphs, only sentences separated by lines. So to proceed with sperm project, you test sperm out and get back to me.
Huh. I don't know. You ask your friends and get back to me. Don't say anything about Smurfs -- it will cloud their objectivity. Smurph shpurm.
J
No comments:
Post a Comment