Ugly Sisters

Richard II was a sea-change play for Shakespeare.  He just let the character go, follow what will.  I do that, when I allow it.  I'm aware of it, but I try to keep these things, if you'll allow it, short.  I have to pull the plug.  

That's what Shakespeare did with Mercutio, killed him off, or he would have taken over — Romeo and Juliet and Mercutio.  He's a hard character to get right.  Lot's a bad performances.  Same with Leontes, the weird king in A Winter's Tale -- probably hard to act, because the actor has to go deep, deep.  These are characters who take over their own writing.  Shylock.  Hamlet.  

Richard II is like me.  Not so much in love with words -- him more than me, because I'm more self-aware -- but self-dramatizing.  Psychic fluidity, not gender.  I like my dick, no slack there, but, who will we pretend to be today, now, in this particular moment.  Peekaboo.  Catch me if you can.  But you can't.  

Richard is a poet who wants to be a victim.  A deeply unlikable character.  But he is the hero.  He shows this in the end, in his death.  Was he weak, before?  He deserves to die.  But he dies like a man.  And all his false words come true, drawn together by the integrity of his death.  Bear that in mind, when you watch any of the many Richard II production I have made available to you.  He, like myself, is the hero.  

And then there's Falstaff, John Falstaff, sweet Jack Falstaff, kind true valiant Jack Falstaff -- he is absolutely a villain.  Cowardly, lying greedy corrupt selfish whoring thieving and without conscience.  But brilliantly likable.  They say it, and it's true, that he is a genuinely great literary invention -- infinite in his faculties, like Hamlet -- infinite in his variety, like Cleopatra.  Almost impossible to play the role badly.  

Simon Russell Beale did that, though.  Blows.  P U.  I've be rewatching the BBC Hollow Crown from some years back.  I'd liked it when it was new.  The Henry VIs are good.  Richard II is good.  I don't really like Henry V, the play or the character.  But the Henry IVs.  Awful.  Terrible.  It's the direction, the director.  Moronic.  Because of Falstaff. 

In every instance, Falstaff is, should be a comic character.  The IVs are comedies.  The moronic director milked them for pathos, as if it were drama.  It's not drama, moron.  It's entertainment, historical and comical.  There is drama in it, for the entertainment value.  It is not, under any circumstances, Shakespeare ... in the sense of, We're Doing Shakespeare!!!  

They did the nearly impossible -- made Falstaff unlikable, fumbling and stupid.  That takes a sort of talent, the way Heisenberg made the best meth.  Take Aaron the Moor, or Barabas the Jew, or Tamburlaine or Iago or Richard III -- so evil that you almost like them.  This is not that.  Falstaff is a bad man that you have to like.  Countless ways to play him, and all of them work.  Except if he's played stupid, and mean-spirited, like this one, Beale's, via, I have to think, the director.  But maybe it's Beale.  I didn't like his King Lear either. 

Orson Welles.  The Chimes at Midnight.  He was the greatest artistic genius of the 20th Century. 

Like Charles Bronson: was he a handsome ugly man, or an ugly handsome man.  Is Beale's Falstaff a stupid smart man, or a smart stupid man.  The former, but it's not worth the thought to figure that out, except it's obvious.  

Conceived, constructed, growing.  Manufactured, self-creating.

Personality is a construct.  It's not who we are.  It's what we show, as a coping mechanism, and a deep deep habit.  It can change.  Gender too is a construct, roles that we play because it's how we were taught. 

But biology, anatomy, sex is not a construct, any more than hormones are concepts.  It is undeniable that we are constructed, in the womb -- if we are allowed to finish that process.  I'm a real boy.

And sexual behavior is not a construct, because instinct is not a construct.  Neuroses, compulsions, fetishes, perversions are constructed -- the way molestation constructs childhood emotional development, the way female circumcision contributes to moslem social stability,  the way foot-binding contributed to old-time Chinese female beauty. 

But, of course, of course, I am being equivocal.  What do I mean by behavior, and by sexual.  Sex as in sexual reproduction is clear.  Male and female, yoni and lingam.  Sperm, womb, egg.  Very linear, and circular.  Then there's all that other crap, beyond biology.  Spiritual, theological, societal, familial, propagandical, molestational, political.  Can't argue with that.  It's real.  Just secondary.  Evolution doesn't care about homosexuals, or castrati.  

Sexual intercourse is like gravity.  Down down down.  Is there an escape velocity?  Castration just makes you weigh less.  

Sex determines gender, the way foot size determines shoe size.  The ugly sisters in the Grimms' Cinderella got their big toes cut off, to make the slipper fit.  If you're a toeless princess, you can be carried by footmen, or lackies rather -- men who are lacking.  But the ugly sisters were not princesses.  They were crippled, ugly women ... and ugly, crippled women.  If that's not clear, and it is, cutting off body parts does not make anyone a princess.  

I've been wanting to get that off my chest, about Falstaff, about Richard.  Princesses are easy: it's a natural fit.  But it's hard sometimes to see who the villains are, and the heroes.  

J

Rated Z

If Benjamin Franklin had a time machine and saw what the United States has become, he'd go back to 1776 and ax murder George Washington.  

I haven't made a study of it, or even given it meaningful thought.  But if virtually any movie from the past few decades were to fall back in time to the '60s, it would be rated X, or prior to MPAA ratings, unreleasable.  

The Motion Picture Association of America dropped the "of America" a few years back. I'd say because there was no more america, but it was just business, like cancelling is just business, the tithe paid to the Church of the Great aWokening.  Goddess bless america, tranzgoddess.

It's not emirica, not amerikkka,  It's just nothing at all.  Canada-south, Mexico-north, not hot or cold, and not even tepid.  Ameriblah, AmeriBLaMe.  Blah blm blame.  

The Crime of Masculinity is, no, not rape, or violence -- same thing.  Being a man, that's the crime, an existential crime, like original sin.  Unforgivable save through repudiation, inexpugnable save through surgery.  Born again, through genital bleeding, into the right body.

Maleness, so penetrative, male, man, masculine.  Not equivalents, as we certainly must know by now.  That's why they prefer to tell us how much they hate white males, rather than white men.  Men are human.  Males are animals.  

As for masculine, that's never a good thing, alone.  It needs to be balanced.   

It's only yesterday maybe that I heard about "deadnaming", via twitter's cancelling of its cancelling policy, for using deadnames -- which would be a tranny's biological sex-name.  Bruce for Caitlyn, or Chastity for Chaz.  We all have the right to change our names.  (That's the spelling he chose, for Caitlyn.  Seems overly elaborate.  But young girls dot their "i"s with hearts, so ... something about his own private puberty.)  My father changed his name some number of times, or multiple names at the same time.  It's complicated.  It would be a matter of freedom, then, the civil liberty of free speech, for someone to be rude enough to use the old, deadname.  

Rudeness is a right.  So is blacklisting, or as it's now called, cancelling.  Boycotting, witch hunting ... as long as our purity is not puritanical, or our rightness is not righteousness -- it's only hypocritical if you don't do it too.  

Orwell would have called it unpersoning, if his imagination had been depraved enough to conceive a need for such a term in a constitutional system.  It was Winston's job in 1984 to revise the news, rewrite or excise the past.  Orwell based the book on the Soviet propaganda machine, erasing disfavored apparatchiks from photos etc.  

This is only the normal amount of hatred we would expect.  It's likely the Romans did not salt the fields of Carthage, but it is believable, true or not.  Cato ended all his Senate perorations with Carthago delenda est, Carthage must be destroyed.  Hating the enemy is normal.  That's right, I said it.  

We all have our priorities.  Ours, as a culture, as a generation, is to destroy the past.  Like the Soviets.  We hate reality.  We know reality by remembering what happens. 

Sadly for me, I do not forget.  It's not a trait that contributes to happiness.  But there it is, whatever it is, hanging like a corpse on a gibbet, stinking and rotting and causing oppression and fear.  The past is always with us, festering, suppurating, until it is faced.  We cannot be facing backwards, angel, but sometimes we must.  Courage to face psychic annihilation, disintegration, or to survive, to thrive, courage to forgive, accept, embrace, be touched.  

I'm not bothering to develop these ideas, here, now.  Each sentence could be an essay.  I expect the diligent reader to contribute to this very one-sided conversation.  You contribute nothing. Silence has its virtues, but passive silence doesn't.  You have the duty of faithfulness.  By now you should have recognized my worth.  Your obligation is to understand that hardly anything I inscribe is actually farce.  So flesh it out.  Case in point: do you suppose this was a digression?  Flesh is out.

Hey.  Jack.  Jack H.  Jack Haych.  Chill dude.  Or are you doing it again, that thing you do, being meta about being meta.  It's sort of hard to take you seriously, with all the games you play.  You just undercut yourself all the time.  Or is it us you're cutting, cutting down, base, base court, down court, down king, come, go.  Oh see, I did it again, I mean you did it.  Or is it me.  Us, we?  Pronoun trouble, again.  That's all folks.  But not.   

The disintegration of his mind is accelerating.  Is there anything we can do, doctor?

But it's another, yet another of their miscalculations.  It's laziness from them of course, and disrespect to you, if it is disrespect.  If you do not deserve respect, you can't really be disrespected.  My distinction is debatable, but I'd say disrespect is an injustice, and if you deserve it, it's appropriate.  So you decide if their laziness is really a problem:

Deadnaming.  Suicide, manslaughter -- homicide, to be used only after the Latin root, "man" -- Homo sapiens; Greek, "same" -- homosexual.  The deadnamee killed the "man", indeed, the homo.  It's a dramatic term, we might say histrionic, deadnaming -- although certainly not hysterical, hystera, "uterus".  But it's more reflexive than illuminating.  

Tranzreformation is not an affirmation, but an execution.  That thing, that dead thing that was so hated, it's dead now, along with its hated name.  

Not a butterfly, metamorphosis, or even a mutant -- mutilation, like a teenager cutting herself with a razor -- is that more a boy or a girl thing.  Which ever, whatever, what ever it was that I was not, am not, and am now, or not.  

The thing that they were, that gender, that sex, that self -- they never were that, and it's dead now anyway, with a dead name, hated, hated enough to slash it to death, rated X for graphic violence and misgendering.  They deny invalidate repudiate kill the past.  As they suppose.  Trying to kill it, kill it dead.  Kill kill kill kill kill kill.  All they have to fear is a prolapse, like a zombie pushing out of its grave.  

It's the same relationship, inverted though, that necromancy would be to resurrection.  Religious ideas, both, the way condemnation has something to do with redemption.  The way degeneration has to do with abortion.  

Penis.  Rosebud.  

J

See our beautiful trans-american highways while you can!

The chinese will of course take Taiwan.  Why not?  biden will tell us to look into his eyes so that we really know for sure that he means it when he talks tough, and they won't believe what's coming.  Ermf man oh man, achqhe believe me you me I mean you pardon me. I'm nah funny! Grrreuh I mean isht.  

But it's refreshing to see true patriotism.  Even if it is from the chinese.  Maybe biden is patriotic too, for the chinese.  BO was patriotic, if by patriot you mean matriotic except for her race, which he rejected.  

I was just looking at that 2000 election map, the tiny blue areas and all that big red empty space.  Population density correlates to politics.  Bread and circus in urban centers.  Solitary long-haul drives in the country.  

I thought, when whichever of our enemies picks its dirty-bomb target, it would be population centers, for the damage. 

Then I thought, no.  It's not damage they want, it's transformation, national castration and reassignment.  They'd want the blue cities to survive, if not multiply.  Because democrat voters will be ineffective and selfish.  No patriotism.  No resolve and self-sacrifice.  Just talk.  Understanding and apologies.  

So it will be economically important, but republican, targets.  Cripple both the economy and the will.  Not major cities then.  Mid-sized and industrial.  Is there any industry left?  Oil centers.  That would ruin us.  

Good plan.  I hope no one leaks this, my plan to destroy america.  You're not a gamer, are you?  

Without america, it will be like after WWI.  The fall of empires, and a division of the spoils for the winners.  Bigger if not new empires -- russian, chinese.  That didn't happen with WWII because there was an america.  No mad scramble.  Just a deal, fair-minded idiot america the sucker, with Stalin.  

The mouse that roared.  Please, america, beat us in a war so we can have prosperity.  Please do not let us win.  

The British empire just drifted away, but the British empire was the most benevolent human institution ever devised by the human mind, carelessness and complacency.  So its former colonies mostly are not the open sewers that the french left, or spain, or germany.

Of the 7 largest countries by area -- Russia Canada USA China Brazil Australia India -- three of them are outright empires.  India is still sane, but Russia and China are ruled, at last, by competent men.  They understand goals, and expansion.  Maybe Putin will be replaced, but he has unified his country -- Russia loves its strongmen. 

I am not a geopolitical strategeryist.  I was sounding the alarum, blowing my own horn in this blog many years ago.  It sounded dire then, with BOpen BOrders and hateful islamists.  I'm the frog that felt the water getting hotter, but that's every conservative.  Not all change is bad, although it may feel uncomfortable.  Growing pains, maybe.  Indeed, the sun's gonna shine. 

I'm rereading Frazer's The Golden Bough.  I don't trust the accuracy or overall theory (all that punitive folk-loathing about menstruation ... seems unsustainable).  But the details are interesting.  In other words, it might as well be the news.  Pick and choose the stories, and an impression gets built.  Frazer was working with his own googtube algorithm.  

We can't prove our worldview by the evidence other interests spoon-feed us.  Selective scepticism.  Like election results and voter fraud. Quite likely that Nixon won, in 1960.  He didn't gore it because that would be bad for the country.  Didn't work out so well for Kennedy -- but it got him remembered.  There would have been no missile crisis, if Nixon were in.  So, even very red and a little blue election-return maps are not clear.  They tell a story, which people might think is true.  

And did you know, the interstate highway system is 46,837 miles long!  

 

It's the largest public works project in history!  Bigger than the Egyptian pyramids!  Bigger than the Easter Island statues!  Bigger than the Great Walls of China!  Eisenhower built it for military purposes! 

Targets will have changed since then.  It's the borders that are important.  Our missile silos are not targets.  biden would not give the order.  It's the Permian Basin in Texas, and Bakken ND, and Prudhoe Bay.  So much for oil.  

Get america walking again.  Horses are good for the environment.  That's right, Mr and Mrs and Ms and Mx america!  For a limited time only!  The american way, and americanx!  

Etc.

 

J

Why I Am in Favor of Genocide

Come on.  You know it's true.  You'd agree with me if ... in fact you do agree, just not openly.  They are nothing but destructive.  Worthless.  You know what I mean.  Subhuman garbage.  Their contribution to history has been completely negative.  Vicious.  Tragic.  I mean look at them.  Weird and sickening.  I find them disgusting.  And what they do to your sense of smell.  Well I won't go on.  They should all be exterminated. Genocide is appropriate. The covid virus.  Or is it viruses.  I guess so, with the different strains, is it?  Omni-cron, per biden.  If Bush had said that, it would have been a strategeristic saturnalia for the party of white supremacy (Democrats).

Maybe genocide wasn't the right word.  Do viruses have genes, alleles?  DNA, yes.  And subhuman maybe wasn't the right word.  Isn't everything subhuman?  Or is that bigoted, speciocentric.  Broader, genus family order class phylum kingdom.  Animal kingdom.  Life itself, inclusive.  After kingdom would come world, seclorum, novus ordo.  Or universe.  

We'd have to narrow it to biological life, what with spirit beings and artificial intelligence, SBs and AIs.  BIAS.  A fair number of people would say human life is not at the top, with everything else being "sub".  Whales and dolphins, and bonobos -- the gigantic mind of hive insects.  All superior, in their unique ways.  

Unpatriotism is the highest form of diversity.  Disloyalty is the highest form of identity.  You may quote me.  I do not like assassins, or men of low character. 

Okay. That virus thing.  You thought it was race, some human 'race'.  Because you are trained that way. Conditioned, like WWII pigeons on an assembly line, pecking out defective-looking torpedo parts.  Honestly.  Why would you think that?  Does this

look like a "race" to you?  Pitiful, the way you were educated.

The word "racism" was invented in the mid 20th century, as a way to cope with Hitler.  (How to cope with Hitler: early intervention.)  It's half the age of "telephone".  The word "genocide" was coined for the Armenian holocaust.  Old wine in new wine skins. 

Who knew — al Sultan, on a par with der Führer.  The Young Turks 

were prior to the Nazis.  

It's like the friendship between Mark Twain and Nikola Tesla: doesn't need to be surprising.  And yes, exactly the same.  

And there you were, your pro-virus offendedness held aloft like a bludgeon, cudgel, knout, you all wound up and ready to judge.  Sheesh.  

That's sheesh in the boomer sense, not genzee.  I just heard about that, yet another flurry of slangisms.  I'm still not comfortable with wack and rad and dis.  I sympathize now with the adults from when I was a kid, the preboomers.  They called our pants "hip huggers", because middle aged men still belted at the waist.  You see old movies, where they use kid slang like it's camel-toe.  Awkward but inevitable.  Can't be unseen, or unheard.  Groovy, daddy-o.  

Every gen needs a name?  Why gen z?  Zombies?  Not gen y, because they have no need to ask why.  They already know all the answers.  That's every sophomore class.  Genexide.  Generzeed.

I remember when I first heard about genex, middish 80s.  Cuz they wanted a distinguisher.  I thought that was moronic. Baby boomer made sense, because there was a boom of babies, what with GIs returning after 4-5 years and starting families.  The so-called greatest generation -- I've had to revise my opinion, given what bad parents they were.  The greatest spoiler generation.  

And they were great only because of historical hardship.  If that's the criterion, every generation in history is the greatest.  The russians would be superhuman.  Africans would be the master "race".  Environmental and sociopolitical hardship require either that you survive, or die.  Nothing great about that.  

 I'd thought mine was the worst generation, but this one, man.  Cancelling?  Is that the millennials?  Worthless.  As for the lost generation, the first named-generation, they were all adults by the time that term was invented, by Fitzgerald or Hemmingway or Toklas was it? whoever.  A literary construct.  Lost in absinthe and Parisian fornications.  A fair degree of inversion.  

Same with redstate bluestate.  Just happenstance.  That year, 2000, the networks just happened to use those colors on the election-returns map.  Almost entirely red.

I had a version like this 

on a teeshirt, a few years later -- as a joke because I knew some lefties.  Generally I don't like clothes with words on them.  Especially brand names.  If they want me to advertise their product, they should pay me. 

But red is left.  Blue is patrician.  Ho hum.  Can't fight the tide.  

Anyways, genocide of a virus isn't even a real thing.  Viruses do their own recombinant DNA.  There's evidence that bacteria have a hive mind, and fungus, mushrooms.  There was a news item from England that a beaver extinct for 400 years was ruining someone's garden.  Smallpox is not exterminated, even ignoring those specimens preserved in lab freezers.  It could come back as slightly-smallerpox, or a-little-biggerpox.  As long as rural chinese farmers raise chickens and pigs, there will be new variants of flu -- and something about bats and wet markets too.  

I'm sure our government educators are correct in informing us about how it was not a lab -- they are so certain and so passionate.  Just what we want, from unelected entrenched bureaucrats.  Speaking of infections.  

W Burroughs' fame was very slightly burnished in his line, 'language is a virus'.  Naked Lunch is one of the very few books I just stopped reading.  Threw it spinning into the trash.  My line is better, that words are what we use to tell lies with.  The prepositional ending is okay depending on how you say the line, aloud.  And that thing about prep endings is just made up anyway, like split infinitives.  John Dryden being fussy — but I do like his Plutarch.  It's okay to break the rules, when you know what they're for.  You know what I mean.  

Language as virus always struck me as a purely adolescent sentiment -- appropriate from a heroin addict.  You freeze all emotional development when you become addicted.  All we are is dust in the wind.

So, some genocide is good.  Not all mosquitoes -- not even all of the bad ones.  Males are vegetarian, and females too, except when, um, pregnant.  But they're always pregnant, almost.  Genocide for fleas?  Tapeworms?  I expect the passenger pigeon can be de-extincted, its DNA into the egg of its closest relative, the band-tailed pigeon.  Dodo birds were pigeon-related. I'd like to see the marsupial wolf recovered.  Conservation is good in itself.  Better is human life.

Is all that clear?  

J

Devotion

 So, political

and religious

Again, political

and religious

In less theoretical terms, 

 

 

 

But maybe it's not less theoretical.  I mean, what people do -- what they fight for, sacrifice for -- is just because of belief.

J

Credis

You believe:

• there is a human spirit;
• this spirit is sexual in the sense of male or female;
• it develops, if it develops, independent of biology and genetics, and Evolutionary or physical influence;
• these spirits tend to inhabit sexual biological bodies that conform to the sex of the spirit;
• sometimes a spirit inhabits a body that is sexually incongruent, resulting in transgender phenomena.

If the word "sex" is rejected, we will concede "gender" as a synonym and euphemism for sex.  

If you prefer the terms "masculine" and "feminine" or their synonyms or euphemisms, rather than "male" and "female", we will so stipulate.  

If the implication of a clear dualism is too binary for you, we will agree that behaviors, psychology, degrees of brain dimorphism, endocrinal profiles, and what have you -- each may be placed on its relevant "male-female" or "masculine-feminine" continuum.  

If the concepts of male-female is too dualistic, Western, Christian or american for you, we will accept the foundational and enduring tenets of any culture or hypothetical civilization you propose, provided that it meaningfully survived the challenge of contact and engagement with some other actual and viable culture.  

We will accept any reasonable definition of "meaningful" you choose, provided that it [1] did/does not excuse catastrophic population collapse, and [2] did/does not allow survival by parasitism, eg, cannibalism or slavery;

We will accept any definition of "reasonable" you prefer, provided it recognizes the law of the excluded middle, the law of non-contradiction, and the law of identity.

Given all this, we must agree that the tranz worldview, Tranzism,

is fundamentally religious.

J

* William Thomas, formerly

YT

Another undoubted triumph for humanity, enlightenment, diversity, inclusion and equity.  Women's swimming champion Lia Catherine Thomas. She has dominated her sport like Babe Ruth; she's a virtual Jim Thorpe -- won the 500 freestyle by seven seconds.  That's how long the fall takes off a 68-story building.  You can just about make toast in seven seconds. 

In the picture below, the young woman behind her is crying for some reason.  Probably because she just came in at number two.  So close.  Well, seven seconds, maybe, but what should women expect?  Lia is a champion.

Here in this candid shot  

she's adjusting her penis.  That's a real issue for men, a little embarrassing, or at least self-conscious, at least for me, sometimes, and women have to do it too, obviously.  I won't spell it out, because it's not a part of satire, parody or farce.  Well, the 'women too' was parody, but I mean the, what, hygiene?  Grooming?  Comfort.

A tailor might ask a man how he "dresses", right or left.  (So I am spelling it out.)  That would be a boxer situation, rather than briefs.  Each has its advantages.  Briefs provide some support, but you can ride up on yourself, I suppose that's how it would be said, if it needs saying.  Not quite like trying to telescope-in a vacuum hose.  With boxers, you're a little more on display, draped all along one side.  I'm a briefs guy, but if I had to choose, say commando, I'd slightly favor left.  But I'm generally ambidextrous.

Despite whatever impression I might have accidentally made in these pages, I still maintain that the swimsuit area should be generally discrete.  Take Lia, again.

Exibit A

She is wearing black for a reason.  Women know that black is slimming, but that's not her, Lia's, problem.  Black is more modest.  I've noticed this myself.  It visually mutes the male genital bulge.  Sorry to be so blunt.  Lia knows this.  Her penis certainly makes for an entirely different silhouette than … hm, how shall I put it? -- than your mother would make.  Modesty behooves us all.

Lia may still have some vestigial behaviors left over from her bro days.  Does she still manspread, maybe on the swim-team bus? -- take up both seats?  

"Oh I'm so sorry, sister.  I forgot myself.  Tee hee."  

It's a guy thing.  Maybe, airing out the curtains?  Is this appropriate, in her?  Let's find out.  Using my very minimal graphic skills, I've brightened Exibit A so you can see with your very eyes that which the traditional biological female athletes might enjoy on display while sharing the women's locker room with her, Lia.  

La!

Exibit B

It might take a moment to orient yourself.  Hi, I'm Lia, champion female athlete, and this is my penis bulge, and my nuts too, but they're much smaller than they used to be.  Cuz I'm a woman.  

And here she is again, tall and proud.

Hey, presto chango! 

Well.  My.  My my.  

This isn't really my cuppa, but I'd lay odds that Lia is NOT circumcised.  I don't have an expert eye, and stats favor that she IS circumcised, or "cut" as the gays say.  But I suppose her parents were not very traditional, re this american folkway.

[So, um, Lia.  Lia.  Dude.  I get it.  You want to dress like a woman.  But their clothes have a different cut for a reason.  Women, smooth.  Men, bulge.  Your onesie needs a little tailoring, for a little extra room.  You were probably more of a grower than shower, back when you had enough testosterone to get erections.  But you're like a face being smothered by a plastic bag.  It's like something out of science fiction, 'Alien' maybe, with that thing bursting out of that guy's belly.  Just saying.  We can see your dick.]

What I find unfair is that Lia, here, appears not to have bosoms. That is a distinct and unfair advantage, re swimming hydrodynamics.  She might be just naturally flat-chested, or, and I hope not, she suffered the trauma of mastectomy (men, or rather, here, male bodies can have mastectomies).  The Amazons of Herodotus removed the right breast as an advantage in archery.  But Lia is certainly more streamline, slicing through the water more efficiently.  That would explain how she wins — and she's six foot one.

It's probably for convenience that he kept her two last relics of masculinity -- his patronym, "Thomas", and her penis.  Changing either is a hassle.  

*ahem*

Be fair.  He's an okay-looking guy.

Woman, meh.

Is it rude, that I put this guy on display, literally reveal a physical part of himself that he must loath?  Call it rude justice.  He puts himself on display -- fully, as is reported, in the women's locker room.

This is a big dude. The fact that Riley Gaines, a paleowoman -- but no, I retract that. She deserves respect, and will not be a part of my farce. The fact that Riley Gaines tied this man in competition says everything about her.  What it says about him is that he is an above-average male athlete.  He's nothing at all, as a man.  But he knows that.  

It's not that he has mental or spiritual illness.  It's that he thinks it's right to compete against women. 

Why pick on Lia?  Aside from the obvious?  Because, there are merely personal injustices like, obviously, a man competing against women, in certain sports.  Then there is murder.  It's his murders that are the point.  Six of them. 

Yes, yep, that's right.  Corporate responsibility.  What reparations this Tranz owes, to Nashville Christian Children and Adults, I won't say.  But the case is clear.  The logic is irrefutable.  Simply by being her identity, tranz, Lia is guilty.  And by being a prominent public figure, he is an appropriate target.  He asked for it.  I dominate women's swimming!  I rule!  King of the world, queen of the seas.  So he should learn that with great attention comes great culpability.  

Also, as a woman, he is guilty of the Lizzy Borden ax murders.  Logic.  Woke, woke logic.

J

Simplifying

Alright, I have to admit that it wasn't very workable, my insistence on people centering their entire lives and speech patterns around me -- my demand that every-body use my pronouns.  This is still important, but I went too far.  I've matured since then, and I under-stand now that while I wanted my pronouns capitalized, if that's what I wanted -- I forget -- I shouldn't try to change every-one else's pronouns too.  Same thing goes for verbs.  

Just me, what I want for my-self.  That's what america is all about.  And by just me, I mean just you too, from your point of view.  We're all here for just our-selves.  That's clear to me now.  Maturity.  You'd be wrong about that, since it's me who's important, not you.  But I can't make you be right.  And I'm okay with that.  You're not even stupid.  Just human.  

I can only say what I want, and trust that you have the human decency to honor that.  It wouldn't cost you any-thing, to use my pronouns for me.  I'm not making any-thing up, no new words to memorize and learn how to pronounce.  There's no-thing about you calling your-self or other people other things.  What could be more reasonable that that?  Live and let live.  It's all about uniting! -- not dividing.

So here are my pronouns, simplified:

In-stead of he/him/his, please use thhey/to thhis/ours. (Proper usage of the objective case: in-stead of "We want him to come", it is We want to thhis to come; in-stead of "This pronoun applies to him", it is This pronoun applies to to thhis.)

Also, when I am referring to my-self, I/me/my/mine will hence-forth be Usns/you/hher/ours.

And when Usns am included in plural pronouns, please replace we/us/our/ours with wewe/thhe dudes/weuns/i.  (No need for caps.)

Oh, and for my own purposes of personal fulfillment, I will be replacing thhey/thhem/thheir/thheirs, along with it/it/its/its and for simplicity all equivalents, eg, thhat/thhose and thhis/thhese, with fish/fish/fish's/fish's.  Obviously I would not require you to adopt this practice.  It would be unreasonable for me to expect the world to reshape it-self around me and my self-actualization.  

Usns'll have pamphlets printed up to hand out -- you can help -- clarifying this.  And laminated cards, for wallets and to hang from your neck on a lanyard.  The new Harriet Tubman $20 bill will be out in 2030, in Kamala's first term, and Usns'll be lobbying fish hher pronouns be printed on the back.  Discretely of course, because not every-thing is about you.  [Okay.  So "that" etc will not be "fish" unless acting as a sort of pronoun.]

For clarity, Usns won't be lobbying discretely -- Usns'll be very persistent and forceful about fish!  Hher friends at Antifa 

and BLM 

are on-board, and wewe will be loud and proud.  Usns don't have close ties to NARAL, 

and NAMBLA 

will not be welcome.

Usns'll be wanting hher pronouns to be printed discretely.  Not printed discretely, like by the printing press of a small company that does no advertising.  Usns mean that on the bills, the letters that spell out the words will be discrete, like with a small font-size.  Fish will all be in good taste.

You can see that Usns do not tolerate that typically bad academic writing style Usns mentioned not long ago.  Clarity!  Precision!  Fish is why you return to fish pages ... no, these pages -- you can rely on hher.  Oh, hee hee, I mean you can rely on, uh hher? you? ...  no, Usns mean me no you can rely on you -- or do I mean hher, I mean Usns mean Usns mean...  Well Usns'm confused.  But you know what Usns mean. 

My no dang hher usage here is copy-right but not trade-marked.  Feel free to adopt fish for your-self, and share fish.  Social Media could spread fish like wild-fire!  Wouldn't fish be great!?!

You can see Usns've adopted a pleasing humility.  When would Usns ever have admitted Usns was confused, before.  Fish is the hard-won lessons of maturity.  If there are any other small points of confusion remaining in your mind, please feel free to inquire about fish.  Usns'm only here to help, and you can help too.  Fish is the least wewe can do.

J

A Brilliant Plan

Why am I going on so much about this?  I'll just say it.  The Trans Nashville Christian Children Killer.  That's it.  Previous to her spree, if it qualifies as a spree, I had touched it as it arose.  Heh.  Touched on this particular peculiar tranz detail of a generally degenerating culture -- all of a piece with pronouns, riots and cancelled careers.  Just stuff, because life is not supposed to be a smooth road.  But none of that was murder.  

Mass murder takes it to another level.  

The queer apologists, and I think I'm using the term correctly -- formerly it was a slur, but now it's reclaimed, like swampland with condos on it.  Repurposed, like aborted fetus tissue harvested for stemcells, or human skin used for lampshades.  Pragmatic, utilitarian.  Prudent.  

The queer apologists remind us that it's seven, not six but seven victims of this unfortunate occurrence.  Of course it was foreseeable, they remind us, because the real and metatragic victim, of amerikkka's white supremasist patriarchy maga-cis republican ultra toxicity, was driven to her or his ultimate expression of self-assertion by me, Jack H, for obvious reasons of hatred, intolerance, envy, evil, hatefulness, Jesus, penises, and evil.  

The Red Chinese demand an apology for US molesting their perfectly innocent balloon (Go Biden 2024!).  They inform us that we're racists for claiming covid came NOT from Florida but China.  Mao blamed "rightists"; Hitler knew that jews were to blame; Stalin identified the "wreckers"; for Pol Pot it was city-dwellers and anyone who wore glasses.  And from exactly this same playbook, manifesto, the queer lobby identifies the victims as the perps.

Society is to blame. The Establishment, the Man, the magaman, the ultraheteroman, the white male man. Make gay love not proxy war with Russia, but, yes, do. Don't trust anyboomer over thirty. Defund the police. Comrade Napoleon is always right.

It's a brilliant plan.  They deserve to win.  They smart, we dumb. The Killer was a victim.  Seven is our lucky number.  Who are the monsters?  In this our new america, it's anyone who has no difficulty identifying what a woman is.  In Neoamerica, Wokeamerica, to be rational is to be hateful. 

A woman is a human adult who has a paleovagina.  We might say biological vagina, or traditional, or natural, or real, or nontranz.  Very rare genetic anomalies can complicate matters, but untidiness is always the case, everywhere.  If we couldn't count on universal generalities, neither logic nor experience could have validity.  That is satanic: what is perfectly adversarial must end in universal chaos.

Seems like all of a sudden, to speak of pronouns we need to talk about the existential qualities of genitals.  If it's all about vaginas and penises, then it should be either academic or pornographic.  Grammar is the last place we'd expect to find gender.  

English is the only European language that is NOT gendered.  We use figurative language -- Father Time, Mother Nature.  But time and nature are its.  The only gendered nouns are those that identify which of two types of genitals are at issue.  Man/woman, actor/actress, bull/cow.  "Earth" is not masc, the "moon" is not fem.  These things do not have genitals, or gender.  In other languages, nouns do not have genitals, but they have gender: der Mond is NOT male, but it is masc; la terre is NOT female, but it is fem.  

A "tranzman" is NOT a man or male, or feminine, and she is fem.  A "tranzwoman" is NOT a woman or female, or masculine, and he is masc.  Because in English, paleopenises or paleovaginas determine our very few gendered pronouns, exclusively. Those individuals who have had transsexual surgery no longer have genitals, strictly speaking, but they still have a grammatical gender -- they were born with it.

What are genitals then, strictly speaking?  A prosthetic limb is not an actual arm or leg, but it is good to have.  A transplanted arm is an arm, as a transplanted liver is a liver -- good to have.  So, I'm honing in on something that is biological in character.  

Reshaped vaginal tissue, supplemented with additional skin and tendon and cartilage, is not a penis.  A transplanted penis is a penis.  In transexual cases, such a transplant-recipient would be a woman who now has an actual penis, thanks to a donor.  

This would be something like a mouse having a human ear growing from its back.  

Science progressing as it is, a penis might be grown de novo.  I'd expect that transplanted testicles will someday be an option -- rather than the cosmetic, prosthetic ovoids currently provided.  

Again, because this seems to be difficult, a woman with a transplanted penis is a woman.  The way a horse with a transplanted horn is a horse with a horn.  Not a unicorn. It's not that unicorns have horns -- it's that they are magical.  If there were magic, a magical horse might be a unicorn.  But there is no magic.  Science does not transform the nature of a thing.  Unnatural results may accrue, but they are unnatural because they are not authentic.

If gene therapy were to became so sophisticated that all XX chromosomes were changed to authentic XY, and ovaries became or were somehow replaced by testes, and the Skeen glands became and took up the functionality of a prostate, and the feminized brain became testosteronic in its compartmentalization ... etc, well, that would be a male body.  

Male authenticity would become merely philosophical speculation, or a question of theology: is spirit "binary".  Thank you, critical gender theorists, for that term in this context. It is apt.

But for reality as it is, genitals are those organs genetically designed for procreation. They are biologically generative.

For men, soldiers, who have been catastrophically wounded, it is altogether fitting and proper that every surgical means be used, to restore them.  They will never be lessened, by their tragedy.  Such losses, in the performance of duty, can never be repaid.  All we can do is honor what is noble.  

That is the opposite of what I'm talking about. 

I'm talking about what is ignoble.  Their brilliant plan.  The tranz takeover of pronouns is so bizarre that it has normalized gay marriage. Brilliant.  Being white is racist, having a penis is violence, outside-in penises are vaginas. Woke politics is so much more an attack on common sense, let alone on civilization itself, that former extremes wither in comparison.  Genius.

It works because conservatives think there are rules, but we want to be polite, so we are silent.  That's what "acquiesce" means -- "to become quiet".   We were silent until we were unable to speak. 

And we are grateful for what we get.  The sop that the Most Supreme Court has tossed our way re abortionism might have made some of us do backflips of glee, but all that August Body really did was allow some hydrogen peroxide for an open wound.  Ouch, but thanks -- master.

Logic.  Logic logic logic.  Penis penis penis.  Wherever there is a NEO, there must be a PALEO.  Thus, there are no more vaginas, only paleovaginas and neovaginas.  No more "women" -- only prefix-woman, either traditional or tranz.  Tradwomen or tranzwomen.

I must have said it already, years ago by now.  I said we will have no more marriages!  Tranzmarriage hath made me mad.

I'm not done yet.  It's not the words weener or peachie, tee hee, that bring me back like a dog to its vomit.  It's the murders.  

Their plan is brilliant.  The murders were a bit much.  But we are, most of us, too polite to bring them up.  And anyway, the new news is that Trump was indicted.  He's the real criminal.  

J

*Xface

YT

You know, like blackface.  Tranz.  Could be Zface.  But X.  X it out.  How is it different.  Let's say it's a white guy, in blackface.  He's NOT black, but he's attempting to represent, if not simulate, the appearance.  How is it different?  You're not black, not a woman, not a black woman.

Well, there's a surgery, if there is, so not as temporary as blackface.  Although the previously completely obscure hiphop beebop doowop boop boop bedoop, um, artist? performer? personality? bandwagoneer has partway tattooed himself toward his aspirational race.  

Vaudevillians like Al Jolson used burnt cork, easy to remove.  Bert Williams was a black performer who wore blackface.  He wasn't black enough, otherwise.  That's a problem nowadays too, not being sufficiently authentically black, not all BLM and Reparational and Democrat.  There are chemical ways to darken, but that would fade, slough off the skin, or the pill or shot would wear off.  Melanin wouldn't be permanently ramped up in cells.  Like the guy who turned himself blue by supersaturating himself with colloidal silver; he's dead now.  

Whereas amputated organs do not grow back.  We're not lizards, most of us, to regrow tails.  Cal Gov Gavin Newsom, 

The Nightmare of California (now streaming on Peacock), might, as he reportedly said, "creep out of my skin for you like the snake that I am.  That's right, sssstupid, I'm coming for you.  Sssscum."  But non-Silurians (or does he identify as Sleestak?) can't regrow penises.  Penis penis penis.  I enjoy my penis, but I depend on my balls -- like the girl you'd party with, or the woman you'd marry.  

So it's not quite the same.  But that is the nature of all analogies.  If there weren't differences, they'd be the same thing.  Blackface, and tranz surgery.

But they're pretending. They've x'ed out their birth genitals, excised, ex-size, and they're passing as something else -- as the other.  I won't bother to inform you about passing.  The difference is that race-passing was for social advantage in a repressive state, and sex-passing is about dysphoria, a dysfunctional emotional state.  

We should have compassion for those who are sick.  It's a christian and jewish virtue.  But to believe the deluded is to follow them into destruction.  We know what male and female is because we have eyes and hands.  It's not belief, it's fact.  A fact is something that can be demonstrated.  Otherwise it's theory, or opinion, or deception, or delusion, or etc.  As they say, someone with an experience is never at the mercy of someone with a theory. 

So, xface.  Latinx, hispanix, whatever.  Larynx, phalanx, manx, minx, lynx, jinx, latinx.  Latino, ex out the o, O-face.

Xface, a sexual blackface, a pretending to hate the male or female that you are, or actually hating what you are and pretending you're the other thing, or you're something that you just made up, or that you feel, or that you overheard and believed.  We'll hammer out the specifics later maybe, over a sun-dappled brunch of brie and Chardonnay, from Gavin's vineyard.

The Genderfix Bible - all "binary" gender errors corrected! Sample (copyright): "For Gox so loved the world that xe gave xers only begotten donx..."

We haven't been asked to participate in a mass hysteria before ... well, the Salem witch trials ... and the Civil War ... and Covidism.  Stalinist Russia, aside from Stalinism, had Lysenkoism.  The Dutch had tulip-mania.  St Vitus' Dance.  Examples are easy.  Ours now is particularly toxic, because wokism is sexual in nature, down past the genetic level, to spirit itself.  Wrong chromosome, wrong sex, wrong race, wrong god. 

J

The Knout of Servility

First of all, I'm sorry.  Sorry for that last one.  It was ridiculous.  Did you even bother to read it?  Long.  Loooooonnnnng.  Just about unintelligible.  What's with this flow-of-consciousness crap?  Rambling on and on.  Could I possibly think that's interesting to anyone but myself?  What a narcissist.  So, sorry.

Long. 

But it took about an hour to write.  So it didn't seem long.  

But long.

Anyways.  

I'm restricting my Fox News watching to Gutfeld.  !  It's not that he's all that funny, but it's light, and there are various contributors, mostly from the right but they have their own take, sometimes.  So it's an echo chamber, but not a megaphone.  The other shows are too polarizing, in too serious a way.  I'm already polarized.  I'm seeking balance, and civility.  Which brings me, skillfully, to my point.

Civility.  Gutfeld mentioned an NPR situation, wherein civility was said to be racist.  Well, NPR.  So, of course.  Everything and everybody.  Even them, against themselves, and the coloreds (did you know that Larry Elder, black talk-radio guy, was a White Supremacist?).  Coloreds, that's right, right?  I'm sure I just read it.  Colored.  Yes, here it is, from NPR dot org, "When Civility Is Used As A Cudgel Against People Of Color". 

"***!"  What.  What?  "***!!!"  What are you talking about.  "***!  ***!"  And you think there's a difference?  "****!  ******!!!"  You're an idiot.  "******************!!!!"  [expletive deleted] and your mother too.  She must be a complete moral imbecile to have produced something like you.  Moron.  "***!"  Well that's too bad.  But it doesn't excuse how bad your judgment is.  Anyway, you're done.  And you're an idiot.

Apparently the Label Politzei imagine there's a difference between being a person who is colored, and a person who has color. The only linguistic distinction I can find is that you're a person who is either colored, or a color.  Being nothing but a color is about as dehumanizing as you can get.  An optical concept, perhaps not even on the visible spectrum.  Is this what Ellision meant by The Invisible Man?  

(Hint: adjectives are not nouns.  The Elephant Man is not a man who is an elephant.)

Anyways.  All I wanted to say, before I was so rudely interrupted, is that the morons in that NPR article failed to distinguish between (among) civilization, civilizing, and civility.  You know, because they all start with civili, and there ain't no pulling out, once you're that far in.  

Here's why they're morons, the committee, the commissariat that contributed to the production of that article and philosophy.  Also, their professors are morons.  And as I already said, the mothers.  I doubt that anything that could rightly be called a father was involved.  Maybe two daddies?  No healthy masculinity.  Just toxic femininity.  

Ah well.  We can only aspire to our ideals.

They are morons because they confused civility for servility.  Servility was, metaphorically, most certainly a "cudgel".  Except the word is not cudgel.  In riffling through their online thesaurus (as their creative-writing teachers urged), searching for an alternative to "club", they chanced upon this picture-painting word.  

They might have learned the correct word, had they ever attended an American History course, if such a course was ever actually available to them.  The correct word is knout.  Lincoln used it, in referencing one aspect of the Democrat Party's major social contribution to mid-nineteenth century American civilization.  Slavery, their Peculiar Institution, for which the Democrats most certainly should pay reparations.  Any American black who has allied herself with the Democrat Party is complicit, and owes reparations. 

Likewise, and again after Lincoln, lash might have been used.  You know, from the Second Inaugural Address?  If they ever heard of it.  

Yet, if God wills that [the war] continue, until all the wealth piled by the bond-man’s two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid by another drawn with the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be said, “the judgments of the Lord are true, and righteous, altogether."

It is a pleasure for those words to pass my lips.  Justice.  That's my point.  We always need grace, but there's been too much mercy in our decadent society — getting away with it, the opposite of justice.  Let's try to earn our blessings for a while.  Be worthy of them.  

That way, when we lose them, as we are losing them, we will be right when we complain that we tried.  Yes, finally, at the end, we tried.  There is merit in not being stupid right to the very end.  We waited until too late, but we did not despair.  That's a theme you could write an epic about.  No epics about those who never even try, even if too late.  

J

I'm Sorry (thing, trigram, opugnia, xher)

I don't know why I did it.  It was wrong.  That thing about my "thing".  It wasn't a typo, like I said — I lied about that.  I did it on purpose.  I'm sorry.  It was thoughtless.  It might even have been cruel.  Toying with you that way.  Low, it was low.  I'm ashamed.  It's bothering my conscience.  But I was weak.  I knew what it would feel like, your hope, all that hope, dashed.  And I did it on purpose, that's what's really so bad.  We all make mistakes.  But this was an "on purpose".  I did it with full awareness.  You must know by now how I am, how I examine things.  You know I will have done that here.  I calculated how you'd be tricked, anticipated your disappointment, and I went ahead and did it anyway.  Inexcusable.

That's how temptation works.  Desire is conceived in the heart.  It should be aborted.  Does the Supreme Court still allow us to get our abortions?  Cuz man oh man do I need one, I mean I needed one.  Too late now.  The monster was born, my thing the monster.  Heh heh.  Gittit?  Cuz my thing is so big.  Huge.  Yeah.  I mean really huge.  Frankly, freakish.  Disgusting and non-functional.  Ugly.  Some sort of genetic mutation like that canadian Gutfeld guy with the gigantic bosoms, is that how you spell bosoms? it's an under-used word.  Boobies, titties, you'd think I'd learn how to censor myself, cuz this is just getting ridiculous, I mean beyond that, pathetic.  Not even close to funny.  What's the matter with me.  Really sick.  Just such bad judgment, and I clearly have some objective gifts, but this is how I use them?  What a waste.  And I'm not even really sorry, what I said before.  Not at all.  I was being insincere.  Yanking your chain, again.  So I deserve what I get, cuz I am incorrigible, unteachable.  Just lying, that's what I was doing.  Like Biden or AOC.

What's with that, "AOC".  Is she important? — this shrill mouth-flapping handwaver?  Another example of Republican incompetence.  "AOC."  Hey, stupid.  Do not use their language.  They do not choose the terms.  We do.  We're the deciders, we control our own language.  Marriage is marriage.  Woman is woman.  Pride is pride.  Choice is choice.  Even gay is happy, although it's too late for that one, if not for all those others.  

Now we need to include adjectives for simple clarity.  Traditional marriage, biological woman, pride of achievement, happy gay, choice to kill a baby...

So, those three-initials of significance, MLK, JFK, BO, BLM, HIV, KKK, etc.  Really, "aoc"?   Her?  It elevates her beyond flattery, given her minimal accomplishments and talents.  Well, Congress is an accomplishment, albeit of party machines and toxic egoism.  And shamelessness is a talent, give her that.  Sometimes it's a skill, perfected by dint of diligent practice.  There may have been a time when she had shame.  Long ago, or really not so long, given her callow age.  

She would not be receptive now to the fact that shame is a virtue.  Shame is the emotion that registers what is socially repulsive, revulsive.  Repugnant, like pugilist or impugn — Latin: repugnare "fight back, oppose; disagree"; from pugnare, "to fight".

So there's a suffix which I may just now be inventing that is more apposite than "ophobia."  Homophobia, islamophobia, etc.  There's a need for the suffix that means to feel not fear, but repugnance.  Something like -opugnia, "to fight, to be willing to oppose".  So, not islamophobia, not a fear of that terrorist cult of Islam.  A repugnance for it — islamopugnia.  

And (yes, I'm going there) not homophobia — homopugnia.  If they're going to label those straights in squaresville, at least be accurate.  Name-calling is sleazy enough.  Lying about it is bidenesque.  And it's not about being homosexual — it's not even a human-normal visceral rejection of the lack of hygiene re sodomy.  Homopugnia is about the public, and successful, attacks on foundational institutions of Judeo-Christian civilization. 

So, not everything they like that we dislike is a phobia. 

And (by the way), not every scandal is a "hyphen-gate", after Watergate. Most would be -aquiddicks, commemorating the cowardice and moral turpitude of young Senator EMK's youthful homocidal Chappaquiddick antics.  Balloonaquiddick, Trans-Nashville-Christian-Children-Killerquiddick, etc.

Aside from partaking more of the virtue of accuracy, this neosuffix also comes equipped with a handy-dandy conjoining vowel, Chapp a quiddick.  Not all suffixes require a conjoining vowel.  So while it's "islam o pugnia", it's not "trans o phobia" or "-Killer a quiddick".  I'd imagine that's because transogender is such an innovated concept.  (If a prefix can become a noun, a noun can be a suffix.  Politics, baby, it's all words.)  

Transophobia just sounds like Bozophobia (more properly coulrophobia, fear of clowns, although more properly, a fear of stilt-walkers).  But with the shared requirement for makeup, bozophobia cuts too close to the ... pubic bone.  Heh.

*ahem*

For those of you whose business it is to observe politics and to comment, from now on "aoc" will be "AO Cortez", like PT Barnum or DB Cooper — hucksters and thieves.  You are Republican, but you don't have to be stupid.  FDR, LBJ — these abbreviations are not mere conveniences.  Franklin or Lyndon would be clear enough as unique identifiers.  The triple monogram ... the trigram is a spotlight, for a virtuoso performer.  Virtuosx.  But it's for a star with real ability, not for the degraded celebrity of social media.  

I point out these issues because it's so basic: the Rectification of Names.  Defining, and defending, the terms. Meaning is real, but it's also rhetorical, with only the reality we give it.  The Constitution for example is either a leaving I mean living breathing document, or it changes not by the corruption of mutation and degeneration, but by the formal process of Amendment.

The Blob is a movie monster of, just, whatever.  That's no way to go through life — as a fat, drunk and stupid language, or government.  Because both, inherently, have vast power.  

The word definition, then.  It means finite.  Finished.  It has a limit, beyond which it is no longer the thing it was.  Language, unlike the Constitution, IS a living breathing thing.  But even new words have their new meanings.  Can you grok it?  Give the oldest syllables the newest kind of meanings.  New vocalizations, either as homophones, or as, um, neophonemes.  Neophoneme is apparently a word that has never been used before.  It is everything it is, a hologram, a YHWH (tetragram[maton]).

It would be easier, but neither does the Trans Nashville Christian Children Killer get her own abbreviation, a ... pentagram.  Unless it's branded into her forehead, in hell.  They won't be speaking much of her anymore, this murdering Tennessee girl and young woman.  It's in poor taste to remind us — opening the wound, or grave, or graves.  We should ignore the fact that she killed and killed and killed and killed and killed and killed, bloodier than Coriolanus.  Coriolpenis, Coriolpeeneo.  

But, point of order.  I just said "this murdering Tennessee girl and young woman..."  Would "this" be correct, politically correct usage?  Genderically received usage?  Or should it be 'these girl and young woman...'  Was she a plural? — they/them, these/those?  No, I remember — she was He/Him.  Pretty conventional.  

Obviously I'm not solid on the newly revealed nuances of biology, or is it sex, or rather gender.  What's the diff between gay and queer, and fag for that matter.  They used to all mean the the same thing.  Gay was the polite word, like Negro used to be.  

It's these invented "pronouns" — first time in recorded history that a pronoun has been invented.  While we're at it, let's invent oxygen and bandersnatches.  Things that are either elementally immutable, or impossibly fantastical.  In this universe, you might have one or the other, but not both, given that universes have laws.  

Is it xe/xher, currently?  Like Pinyin chinese?  I'm more of a Wade-Giles guy, myself.  Mao Tse-tung, not Mao Zedong.  If it's good enough for The Little Red Book, it's good enough for me.  Gimme that old time religion...  Chiang Kai-shek, not Jiǎng Jièshí; Teng Hsiao-p'ing, not Deng Xiaoping ... well, I might be wrong about that one.  But I still haven't given up about the Peking-Beijing controversy.

 

You can't just go changing the rules.  That's cheating.  Debate and vote.  But that's like wanting that old time religion.  Hidebound.  Don't you know?  You can change your spots, your g-spot, reposition it so it's part of a penis, I guess.  I'm a little vague about g-spots.  I don't even have a relationship with my prostate. The gays tell me it's quite the target. It's just getting there that puts me off.

Have I gone too far?  People have to let me know.  But I sure have used a lot of italics.  Must be a record for me.  Like my gigantic thing.  And, bandersnatch.  Another word for sacgina?  Andro-snatch.  

So, as I was saying before, you deserve what you get. You deserve to be tricked and betrayed, because you let it happen. You didn't bother to think it through. You know how I am, but you know that I have limits, as we were just discussing. I will occasionally resort to vulgar language, but it has been considered, used as a part of a persona I have donned for the moment. A guise of my disguise.  You have every reason to know that I would not be showing you my thing ((talk about it, sure, all the time.  It's hideous).  Email me privately.)

I apologize for any misunderstandings.  Mistakes were made.  I hope we can all learn and *move on from this unfortunate matter.  I will be taking some time off to spend with my family.  Thank you, and God bless America. 

J

*For more information, or to offer help, contact JackH@MoveOn.Org

Another N-Word

Given the potential extinction of women's sports, due to participation by chemically or surgically castrated males, we need a third category.  Men's sports, women's sports, and nontrans-women's sports.  For clarity.  The grabbag of "women's" sports is now a sort of middle ground, equal in theory to what "men's" sports should be.  

"Men's sports" is something in which reconfigured (biological or born) women (who are allowed to be presumed to be New Men (hominus novi, like Cicero in Classical Rome)) literally NEVER compete.  Trans um men NEVER compete against biological men.  But they could, they could, if they didn't mind being beaten like a rug in competition.  Losing like Custer at Little Bighorn.

Maybe they'd win at billiards, or archery?  Maybe they'd dominate.  Maybe individuals who are given 10 times their biologically normal baseline of testosterone are given an extraordinary, one might say abnormal, boost in accuracy.  Food for thought.  An area for post-graduate investigation.

I recently heard vagina-women proposed as a sports-category option, but this won't do.  The pubic sac that surgeons construct, for castrated men of a certain identity, is popularly called a "vagina".  Any man (or even woman, whatever that is), who's had intimate contact with an actual, evolutionarily-designed vagina would be surprised that this modern surgical artifact is identified as a vagina.  

Likewise, ovary-women wouldn't do, first because the trauma of a hysterectomy doesn't make a woman stop being a woman.  As for the men, at this point having an ovary transplant or implant is not reportedly a thing.  Tranz is about appearances -- silhouettes and superficialities, skin deep.  

I'd think of the constructed "vagina" in question as analogous to the way a mucous fistula (the opening for a colostomy bag) is like an anus.  It takes the place and does the job, sort of.  Operative difference being, a mucous fistula has a metabolic function, whereas the sac vagina, sacgina, is entirely cosmetic.  Cosmetic surgery can be absolutely vital, as with catastrophic disfiguration.  But the catastrophe should not have been voluntary.  

But look at me, there I go again, with my values-laden language and my presumptive morality.    

Yes, I am too graphic and offensive, for those who would be offended.  Is truth a defense?  No, it is an absolute defense.  But not an operative one.  We modern americans do not have the right to be offensive.   

Offendedness is the real point of the First Amendment, as interpreted from the penumbrae of the emanations of the vapor of the supposition of the presumption of the intimation of the miasma of the excrescence of the constitution, by the Court Most Holy and Supreme, more formally known as the Tribunal del Santo Oficio de la Inquisición.  (Hyperbole is also an absolute right.)

Like the Sephiroth of the Tree of Life, such emanations are religious.  Who knew.  The Kabballah and the Constitution are practically the same thing.  Just goes to show ya.  Ya learn something new everyday.  Woman, Constitution, and other debatable theories. 

As established in the precedent laid down in Humpty Dumpty v Connecticut, words mean whatever we, or rather, whatever they want them to mean ... whether here in Wonderland, or beyond the looking glass.  As I observed not long ago, some sexual identities are entirely dependent on looking-glasses and the hours spent applying makeup.  

It is these glass-gazers who know true reality — it is these seers who foretell our future, our destiny.  We are Evolving into that sort of sexless bacteria that exchanges packets of genetic material, like a handshake.  Yuck.  Wash your hands.  What's that goo?  Hair gel?

"Normal" used to be a word we were allowed to used in polite company.  Now it's another N-word.  I hope sacgina is acceptable.  It lets real women avoid having to describe themselves as non-trans woman.  Seems like people should be able to call themselves what they have always called themselves, without contradiction.  

Then again that's the problem — men claiming they've always been women.  They would be sacgina men, or women ... it's confusing — men with sacginas calling themselves women.   

What should the women who call themselves (non-competitor) "men" be called? — I mean, not for name-calling, rudeness, but for accuracy rather than emotion?  What clear descriptor might there be for the full-blown post-surgical counterpart — women with neopenises calling themselves men?  Maybe ... neopenis-women.  

At least neopenis is widespread online ... oh, only 39k on google.  "Transwoman" has almost 40 million.  Anyways, I completely made up sacgina.  

Peen-neo?  Sacgina men and peeneo women?  We'll take a survey.  Whatever the majority wants.  Popularity is what democracy and truth and reality are all about.  

It's The New Adventures of Sacgina and Peeneo!  Streaming now on Disney+!!!

Why do I return, in recent months, so frequently to this tranny topic?  I repeat myself, but in new ways.  Aside from the power of its symbolism for the decay of our civilization, it is a sad fact that sex is a constantly salient topic, and an urge and a compulsion.  An appetite, albeit not, reportedly, for everyone — one of the alphabet sexualities is a-sexual.  Asexual.  We ignore the inherent contradiction of the diction ... oh! dickshun, giddit?!?  Heh heh...  But sex itself is an urge for most of us.  

It's not that it's sex.  It's that it's so basic to society and to biology.  As hard as the deluded and disturbed are fighting and killing for their version of change, we need to mount a defense, and my sarcastic and potentially painful paragraphs are part of it. 

We will be instructed, as soon as some Lefty thinks of it, that "most" is a racist term, as indicating and supporting a non-minority. Regardless, there is still some statistical power in numbers.  Measurement is a great deal of what science is (even the Covid Religionists acknowledge this, with words).  Objectivity, enumeration, measurement, consistency and stability and reliability, these are, really they are, how we establish what is normal.  

The thing about knowledge is that it can be known.  Identify things as what they are, illusions dismissed, and we arrive at reality. A sacgina is not a vagina.  A peeneo is not a penis.  However improbable, this must be the truth, Sherlock.  Because it is impossible that a thing is what it is not. 

How many ways do I have to say a man is not a woman, and vice versa.  I keep circling back.  My problem is that I insist on truth over feeling.  If the physical universe were theistic it would respect this in me.  Society, at the moment, if it knew of me, would hate me.

Me and Jesus.  Ah. 

J